Skip to main content

Nokia solar-powered phones, and the search for the next big thing

Lots of people are looking at Nokia these days and wondering if they'll be able to pull a rabbit out of a hat that will keep them at the top of the industry.  Some are looking at their overall market position and improving app ecosystem.  Some are looing at their mobile ad revenue.  Some at their success with low-end phones in emerging markets.  Some are looking at how good Windows Phone is becoming.

I think that all of the above matter a lot.  But at the same time, they're all evolutionary, and none of them are particularly revolutionary. They're all a continuation of today's big thing, and none of them are tomorrow's big thing.

That's why I'm very intrigued to see Nokia's new experiment in solar powered cellphones.  They're taking running solar-powered cellphones and putting them into use in four different places, to measure how they work in practice. This means that the phones exist, and that the technology is close enough to final that experimental measurements of effectiveness are worth gathering.

Nokia's not saying yet what solar power technology they're using, although they've claimed that they'll give details soon.  Grizzly Analytics knows of a few solar power technologies that Nokia is researching:

  • Silicon Carbide NanoFlowers - This NanoTechnology material has two interesting properties. One is that they gather solar power. Another is that they're water-repellent, giving them the self-cleaning nature that Nokia included in their Morph vision.  Others are also researching Silicon Carbide NanoFlowers for solar energy, including Singapore's Institute of MicroElectronics.
  • NanoWire solar cells using nanowire networks - This NanoTechnology structure also has other uses, such as sensing molecules in the air.
  • Phoactive layers on touchscreens - This is an approach to having touchscreens themselves gather energy from "incident radiation," including solar.
Details on this and other Nokia research are available in a Grizzly Analytics report on Nokia NanoTechnology research.

It's not clear yet which of these Nokia is using in their new experiment, if any.  And it's not clear whether their technology will be as good as other solar power technologies being researched.  But we may be seeing one or more of these technologies leaving Nokia's research labs and entering real application.

Will solar powering a cellphone recapture Nokia's market dominance?  Not by itself. But this just might be a sign that Nokia is actually working to take technologies from their research labs and move them into market.  The inability to do this is one of their big failings in recent years by many accounts.  If they can succeed at productizing some of their advanced research, they may be closer than others to a true "next big thing." 

And a true "next big thing" could be the true revolution that will catapault Nokia ahead of companies still worrying about all the issues of today. It might be solar powered phones, or flexible phones, or phones with built-in pico-projectors, or phones that display on eyeglass lenses, or any of the many other things that Nokia and others are researching.

What do you think? Is solar powering a cellphone a big thing? What else will be a big new thing? Will Nokia be able to productize their advanced research?

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what