Skip to main content

Predictions for device waterproofing

Back in March we predicted that Apple might acquire waterproofing-technology start-ups P2i or HzO. We saw great waterproofing technology at MWC 2012 from these and other companies, and based on our research, we found these two to the be the ones likely to be acquired.

Now, just over six months later, we think M&A in this area is getting close. The most likely buyers include Apple (despite the iPhone5 having been released without the rumored waterproofing) and Samsung, and other potential buyers include Sony Ericsson, RIM and LG.  Motorola is already selling "splash-proof" phones, based on P2i's technology, and Fujitsu is also selling phones with fully-submergable waterproofing technology of their own.  Obviously these technologies may be licensed and not acquired, but we think some manufacturers may want to get this technology and keep it out of competitors hands.

HzO’s WaterBlock solution uses a gas vaporization & deposition process and thin-film nanotechnology to coat a device’s electronics with a protective layer. HzO’s process does not coat the exterior of the device or the connection points of the jacks, rather they coat the inner components and connection points in the device.


P2i’s nanotechnology forms a protective layer over the entire surface of a product, so that water beads and runs off without being absorbed.  The company’s patented technology employs a special pulsed ionized gas (plasma) to attach the nanometer-thin polymer layer.

There are other companies with strong waterproofing technology, including Liquipel and Ross Technology.  In addition, many mobile companies have researched waterproofing technologies, including Toshiba, Fujitsu, Motorola, Nokia and others.

But HzO and P2i appear the most likely to either be acquired or enter a strategic alliance with a major phone manufacturer.  Not only have both been recognized recently for their technology excellence, but both have specifically focused on incorporating their technology into phone manufacturing processes, not only waterproofing individual devices.

Grizzly Analytics expects to release a report soon on waterproofing technology.  In the meanwhile, feel free to contact us with any questions you have on device waterproofing technology or our predictions for how it will reach market.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what