Skip to main content

Sensor Fusion goes solo with WiFiSLAM

Over a year ago, in our analysis of indoor location positioning technology, we noted a lot of research by major mobile companies in sensor fusion, using a smartphone's sensors to detect the phone's motion and thereby track the phone's location.  At the time we predicted that start-up companies would emerge that take this approach to indoor location positioning.

In the year since, we've seen a number of start-up companies launching sensor fusion technology. In recent months we've blogged about the Senion Labs launch in Singapore, which was the first large-scale commercial launch based on sensor fusion, and Pole Star's launch that included sensor fusion for iPhones, both of which integrated sensor fusion with other technologies. We also blogged about SenionLabs sensor fusion technology when we first saw it at MWC 2012.

The reason that these companies used sensor fusion in conjunction with other technologies is that sensor fusion is very hard to implement with precision.  The reason is clear: If you're tracking the motion of a phone, and you're off by a single degree in measuring the direction you're walking, the error will compound itself very noticeably. The same is true if you are off by a little bit in measuring how far the phone has moved, and might not know which door the user entered. One solution is to implement sensor fusion in hardware, as several chip companies are doing, and another is to use other approaches (map constraints, Wi-Fi) to correct the errors of the sensor fusion.

But now a American start-up called WiFiSLAM has demonstrated sensor fusion technology operating all by itself, tracking location effectively without any use of Wi-Fi or GPS technologies.  Their demo video shows their system tracking the phone's location as it moves around a parking lot, with some deviations but all in all precise enough for any application.

Note that we don't know exactly what it took to get this demo running.  The demo looks like it used map constraints, for example knowing where there are cars and assuming that the person isn't walking through a car, and thereby constraining the sensor fusion. They may also have held the phone very carefully and in a specific orientation.  But it's still a very impressive demonstration of an up-and-coming technology.

WiFiSLAM is a relatively new start-up with Wi-Fi based technology, that's distinguished itself in the past with their self-service location-mapping applications.  This is the first we've seen of their sensor fusion, which is in the process of being integrated into the rest of their solution.

Take a look at their sensor fusion demo below, and read more about it here.



We look forward to WiFiSLAM bringing this new technology to market, in conjunction with their mapping tools and the rest of their solution.

Want to understand all the ins and outs of indoor location positioning technology research and solutions?  Check out the Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning technology.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what