Skip to main content

Indoor location technology enabling mobile payments

It's always fun to come across a new and valuable application of indoor location technology. For the most part, indoor location is fairly straightforward: Figure out a person's location (or their phone's), put it on a map, and enable navigation and all sorts of other services based on their location, similar to outdoor GPS services. But every now and then a truly innovative application comes along.

Israel-based WiseSec is using their indoor location positioning technology to enable "NFC-like" mobile payments without NFC.  This means that non-NFC phones can be used in an NFC-like manner, swiping against a sensor at a point-of-sale to make a secure payment.

WiseSec's indoor location technology is based on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons, which enable BLE-enabled smartphones to track their location.  The company claims that 50-60 such beacons can cover a 100,000 square-foot site - obviously more beacons means more accuracy.  With enough beacons, their system can reportedly deliver sub-meter accuracy.  One of their beacons, still in development, is shown here.  The company specializes in indoor LBS and navigation, location-based mobile security and cyber protection, and mobility customer experience technologies for the retail market.  

Other companies have used Bluetooth and BLE for indoor location positioning.  We've blogged before about technology from Quuppa and Pole Star, and our in-depth report analyzes research by many other companies as well.  Motorola (and now Google) has a granted patent that covers some aspects of this approach.

But WiseSec is using these same beacons for mobile payments.  Instead of NFC-enabled phones swiping near NFC sensors, a BLE-enabled smartphone with WiseSec software can be swiped near their BLE beacon, and make a transaction upon sensing the very close distance.  Just like NFC.  Their system tracks the phone's movement, and are accurate enough to detect when phones are within 10cm of a sensor. (Their accuracy apparently increases as phones get closer to sensors.)

We wrote almost a year ago that mobile payments can be easy and secure even without NFC. As we wrote then, Paypal is working heavily in that area.  The key question is always how the app on the handset knows how much to pay and to who, in the absence of NFC.  WiseSec's approach seems to address this well.

WiseSec has been operating until now in the area of military and enterprise security, and is only now moving into commercial markets. The mobile payments we've described are not their central focus - they're offering a full range of indoor location services as well.  We look forward to seeing WiseSec's technology reach market, and also to seeing whether indoor location infrastructure can provide a strong solution for mobile payments.

Want to discuss indoor location technology, GeoFencing, or other mobile technologies with a Grizzly Analytics analyst at the Mobile World Congress (MWC)? Contact us at info@grizzlyanalytics.com to schedule an appointment.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what