Skip to main content

Apple acquires WiFiSLAM

News broke in the Wall Street journal blogs on Saturday that Apple has acquired WiFiSLAM, reportedly for around $20 million.  This is one of the first major acquisitions in an area that's poised to explode in 2013.

The Grizzly Analytics 268-page report on indoor location positioning technology profiles both Apple and WiFiSLAM, and predicts that Apple will make an acquisition in the area.  Here are a few reasons that their acquisition of WiFiSLAM makes a lot of sense.

Apple has for years been preventing indoor location apps from running on iOS.  They've done this by withholding Wi-Fi received signal strength indicator (RSSI) data from apps.  This is the data that most Wi-Fi-based indoor location systems use to analyze nearby Wi-Fi access points and calculate their location.  We're written before (here) about this problem and how some companies are getting around it. But the biggest question has always been why Apple was doing this. They're the pioneers in enabling third-party apps. Our speculation has always been that Apple had plans in the works for indoor location.

The other big indication of Apple's preparation for indoor location positioning is their logging of Wi-Fi access point locations, as Google and Microsoft are also doing. In 2011 Apple admitted that they were collecting this data for use in indoor location positioning. They also have a granted patent and several filings in the area.

WiFiSLAM is one of over 50 start-up companies working in the area of indoor location. Many of these companies, WiFiSLAM included, started with Wi-Fi signal fingerprinting, and expanded to incorporate sensor fusion (a.k.a. inertial navigation) and map constraints.

WiFiSLAM is distinguished from the others, however, in two very important areas.  First, they have demonstrated motion sensing by sensor fusion (inertial navigation) that works solo, without any other technologies integrated. Most other sensor fusion systems have bee forced to add other technologies, to avoid small errors in sensor fusion building up over time.  This technology isn't yet on the market, likely because it only works this well under certain conditions, but nonetheless it's a very strong achievement.

WiFiSLAM's second distinction is even more novel. They have released a mobile app that enables any smartphone user to take a picture of a map of their indoor site, walk around the site a few times, and have that site work within WiFiSLAM's location positioning system.  This app enables much easier crowd-sourcing of indoor maps than Google or others have, and would enable iPhone indoor positioning to spread like wildfire as iPhone fanboys jump to upload their site maps.

All in all, Apple's acqusition of WiFiSLAM looks like a real win for Apple and for the market. Hopefully Apple will incorporate their technology into iOS in a way that will enable 3rd-party indoor apps to work on iPhones and not only on Android.

Apple also has a unique way of legitimizing technologies and leading a wave of activity in new areas. Who will be the next indoor location companies to be acquired? Grizzly Analytics predicts that companies with strong sensor fusion technology will be prime targets of major mobile companies (SenionLab and Loctronix are two examples out of many). We also predict that mobile commerce companies, like EBay (PayPal), Amazon or local.com, will acquire indoor location companies focused on retail (PointInside and Aisle411 are two examples out of many).

Whatever the future holds, the indoor location area is heating up!


Want to learn more about the indoor location positioning area? Check out the extensive 268-page Grizzly Analytics report on the area, profiling over 50 start-ups as well as research by major mobile, chip and network companies.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what