Skip to main content

Adding more Smarts to Smart Wireless Lighting

Wireless Lighting. Smart lighting. These are phrases that are starting to reach market, at least among early adopters. To some it sounds like the obvious next thing. To others it sounds like techies making simple things complicated.  It’s certainly a new and growing trend, with several start-up companies and projects in the area, and some major electronics companies joining the fray.

“Wireless lighting” refers to systems in which individual bulbs can be controlled wirelessly. “Smart lighting” refers to systems in which individual bulbs can be controlled intelligently by a computerized control unit. In many systems the two are combined, with a computer controlling the light bulbs intelligently and wirelessly, and the terms are often used interchangeably.

Is smart wireless lighting the wave of the future, or a silly use of technology for no good purpose?

Looking at some of the start-ups in the area gives credence to the cynics. One project, for example, promotes the ability to adjust the lights in your room from your smartphone or tablet, having lights dim or flash when you get notifications on your phone, and have a set of lights flicker to the beat of the music you’re listening to. Another project uses smart lights to visualize data, changing color to reflect the weather forecast, the types of messages waiting for you, and so on. Are these really the goals and dreams that drive new technology? Will enough people want to have any of the above lighting features to enable a company to stay in business?

Bigger companies, however, are focusing on delivering real value with wireless lighting. For example, LG Innotek, a sister company of LG Electronics (LGEAF), is delivering wireless lighting in industrial settings, where site owners want to deploy lighting without having to run the electrical wires in the walls and ceilings. This benefit has made LG Innotek’s wireless lights valuable to a number of big industrial customers. They also add motion sensors to their lights, enabling them to act as security or emergency lights.

LG Innotek is now taking their wireless lights to a new level. The company is exploring the use of ultra-wideband (UWB) radio chips from a start-up company called DecaWave in place of its current wireless network. UWB has several benefits, including low power usage, but its most game-changing benefit is its support for indoor location positioning. DecaWave’s DW1000 chips, currently under exploration by LG Innotek, can determine their own locations relative to the locations of other chips in the area. With UWB-equipped lighting installed, other UWB-equipped objects or tags in the area will be able to determine their locations very precisely.

As a practical benefit, lights that contain location-positioning chips can be put anywhere, and they will register their own locations in the controller system. This means that controlling the lights wirelessly doesn’t require managing where each light bulb is placed, rather each light can position itself on a console’s map. This is a big time-saver in a big industrial site.

Wireless location-tracking lights can comprise a location-tracking system, to track the locations of people, equipment, carts, and other industrial equipment as they move around the site. A big challenge in industrial location systems of this sort is to deploy the location-tracking infrastructure, and if this is included in the lights, this requirement is handled.

Other companies are also looking at adding location positioning to lighting systems. Philips (PHG), for example, is also planning to add location to their personal wireless lighting systems. They are using Visible Light Communications (VLC) technology to transmit each light’s location to camera-equipped devices nearby. This has an advantage of working on more devices, since the visible light communication can be picked up by smartphones and tablets with their built-in cameras, but it won’t work when the lights are off, when power is off, in an emergency situation, and when there is smoke or other interference in the air.

In principle, visible light can in principle provide more precise distance and location measurements than most radio methods. When light is used in very short pulses, it can be used for high-bandwidth communication and can measure distances very precisely. But in practice, most visible light systems for indoor location can only handle signals from one light at a time. Such systems can determine their general location, usually right below the light whose signal they are receiving, and this is enough for a lot of applications. But such systems cannot do precise location positioning in the way that radio-based methods can, and certainly not achieve the 10cm accuracy that UWB-based methods can achieve.

Most importantly, the UWB wireless technology being explored by LG Innotek won’t only be for location positioning, but will also support the wireless control that LG Innotek has been delivering. While it’s transmitting information to turn lights on and off, the radio waves themselves will support highly-accurate location positioning. At the same time as industrial sites are selecting LG Innotek’s lighting for the cost benefits of wireless control, they’ll gain the ability to deliver location positioning.

So if you’re working on deploying wireless lighting around your site, it makes sense to deploy lighting that supports location positioning. Not only will your console know where your lights are automatically, but you can also track locations of people and things moving around your site. These benefits might not be as fun as having lights flicker to the beat of your music, but it’s a lot more tangible a benefit.

Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what